The faculty has both the professional competence and the jurisdiction to determine instances of academic dishonesty; the student has the right to appeal the charge when he or she believes it to be in error. The basis for an appeal is, a) to appeal the charge itself, or b) whether the consequence has been determined fairly.

Every student has the right to know at the beginning of any semester how academic dishonesty will be handled. For this reason the instructor has the obligation to present this information to the student at the beginning of the semester as part of the syllabus. Once the semester begins, an instructor should not make substantial changes to the system and should inform the students of even minor changes. If an instructor does not provide such information, the student has the right to seek redress. The following procedure is also followed in the case of a grade appeal.

Procedure:
Step 1. The student who wishes to contest a charge of academic dishonesty should first make an effort to discuss the matter with the instructor and attempt to resolve the problem concerning the disputed charge. (If the instructor is away from the university during the period of the appeal, the student may proceed directly to the department chairperson.)
Step 2. If there is no satisfactory resolution at this level and the student wishes to pursue the matter further, the student must initiate a formal appeal by the end of the sixth week after the student is notified of the charge. The appeal must be made in writing to the instructor and a copy sent to the department chairperson, who will then schedule a meeting with the student and the instructor. In the case of a grade appeal, for appeals unresolved at the end of the semester the student will select between receiving the course grade calculated with the penalty or an incomplete for the course.
Step 3. If the department chairperson cannot resolve the dispute in a manner satisfactory to the parties concerned, the chairperson will notify the appropriate dean of the school in which the course is taught. The appropriate dean will then attempt to resolve the problem.
Step 4.
a. If the appropriate dean judges that the appeal is without sufficient basis, the appropriate dean can so rule, and the case is closed.
b. If the appropriate dean is in doubt or thinks it possible that the academic decision should be changed contrary to the wishes of the instructor, the appropriate dean will request the Faculty Council to provide a list of the names of nine faculty members, randomly selected, from which the appropriate dean, the involved instructor, and the student each will choose three to consider the matter. (If agreement on all three cannot be reached, the dean will fill any remaining spots on the committee from the names on the list.)
c. Both the instructor and the student will present their cases to the committee. (The appeals committee will make no effort to establish whether an instructor’s academic honesty policy is academically sound; rather it will attempt to establish whether an instructor’s practices and procedures were followed consistently, fairly, and accurately according to the standards set forth in the syllabus and other course directives.)
d. The committee will then decide by majority vote to recommend whether the academic decision be changed and notify the dean of its decision. The committee will provide the appropriate dean with a written summary of the main reasons for its recommendation. The appropriate dean will make the final decision after carefully considering the recommendation of the committee. If the final decision is contrary to the recommendation of the committee, the appropriate dean should explain the reasons for the decision in writing to the committee.
Step 5. The appropriate dean will then notify the instructor, the department chairperson, and the student of the decision, ordinarily by the end of the semester during which the appeal arose.